I am not much of a fan of John McCain. However, there is no way that I could ever vote for Obama. Here is a good summary of why Obama and other liberals are not worthy of my vote.
Sure, things in America are not so great and McCain may or may not continue many of Bush's policies. Obama's mantra is "change we can believe in." But change is not always good. Sure, I believe in the changes an Obama administration would bring, I just don't like them.
Spread the wealth!
An admission that Obama wants to use the power of the federal government to forcefully steal more of your money.
Barbara West of Florida's WFTV grilled Joe Biden about a potential Obama administration's marxist leanings. She even quoted Karl Marx ("from each according to his ability, to each according his need") and asked how Obama is not a Marxist if he intends to "spread the wealth."
Biden asks if the question is a joke. Personally, I find nothing funny about Obama's Marxism.
I'm mesmerized by Biden's last comment. When asked what he would say to people who are concerned that Obama wants to turn America into a socialist country, such as Sweden, Biden said, "I don't know anyone who thinks that except the far right wing of the Republican party." Hey Biden, you big jabroni, you must not know any Libertarians. I am no where near the "far right wing of the Republican party" and Obama's marxist leanings scare me.
Some pickings from the internet on Obama and guns.....
Barack Obama Supports Gun Rights (NOT!)
Revenge of the Bitter Gun Owners
The Obama Nightmare
Obama’s Anti Gun Rights Record and He Must Not Be Elected.
www.GunBaNObama.com
McCain has come to the great realization (finally) that something isn't quite right with Obama's taxation policy.
McCain suggests Obama tax policies are socialist: "Republican presidential candidate John McCain on Saturday accused Democratic rival Barack Obama of favoring a socialistic economic approach by supporting tax cuts and tax credits McCain says would merely shuffle wealth rather than creating it."
Shuffling wealth? Sounds to me like "redistribution of wealth." A phrase which absolutely nauseates me.
I am not endorsing McCain's economic policies, although, McCain's economic policies would be less detrimental to America than Obama's.
If we really want fairness in the tax code we need to institute the flat tax or the FairTax. This whole "redistribution of wealth" concept and the idea of "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need" is merely Marxist BS.
How much does Barack Obama speak for you? Find out:
Out of the 48 or so question in the test, I agreed with Vladimir Lenin, er...I mean Barack Obama on just 2 questions.
If Obama is elected president, Jesse Jackson claims that, "'Zionists who have controlled American policy for decades' will lose a great deal of their clout."
Remember that J.J. is the man who said, "Barack's been talking down to black people.... I want to cut his nuts off" and of course called Jews "Hymies" and NYC "Hymietown."
I'm glad that we "Zionists" (a.k.a. Jews) are loosing control of America. Running America from my living room is a bit tiring.
One of my favorite slogans from the desk of one of my most admired politicians.....
There is a push in some areas of the country to get ex-felons to the polls this November. I don't have much of a problem with voting laws which allow people, convicted of certain felonies, to regain their voting rights after their debt to society has been paid in full. But I do have a problem with someone mounting an effort to help someone, in this case ex-felons, under the guise of actually giving a damn about the people that they claim to want to help. There is often something more sinister behind it all.
Push to register felons to vote could aid Obama
Here are a few interesting excerpts:
"RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — Undaunted by the heat, James Bailey spent his late-summer afternoons walking Virginia's bleakest neighborhoods on the hunt for ex-cons — each a potential voter who might cast the decisive ballot in this hotly contested state........Interesting.......so this effort is not about helping people who have committed crimes, paid their debt to society and would like to return to and contribute to society......its about getting Obama elected.Nationally, there are roughly 4 million released felons whose convictions have cost them the right to vote at least temporarily, if not permanently. To return to the ballot box, felons must negotiate suffrage laws that vary from state to state, in many cases working with election officials who can be both unfamiliar with the law and hostile to former convicts seeking to register......
Such challenges (getting felons to attempt to get their voting rights restored) matter little to Bailey and others trying to return former criminals to voter rolls, an effort they consider crucial in light of the results of the past two presidential elections: A shift of a few hundred votes in Florida in 2000 would have changed the outcome of the presidential race, and the results in 2004 came down to a margin of 119,000 votes in Ohio.
The nonprofit groups and individual activists making the push on felons' behalf agree the effort is broader this year than in previous elections, even if they aren't necessarily making a coordinated push. They expect that effort to benefit Barack Obama more than John McCain, given that the population of former felons is disproportionately black."
"Kenneth Glasgow served 14 years on robbery and drug charges in Alabama. Now a pastor, Glasgow launched a voter registration drive inside the prisons in Alabama, where state law allows voting by felons convicted of lesser crimes such as possession of small amounts of drugs, battery or attempted burglary — even while still serving a sentence.'It's not a black-white thing,' Glasgow said. 'It's that people will see Republicans standing against having people's rights restored while the Democrats aren't.'"
Only Republicans, and not Democrats, stand against restoration of people's rights? Democrats are not standing against people's rights? Really??!! How about my right to privacy, my right to self-defense and gun ownership or my right to keep more of the money that I earn?
Both parties are guilty of expanding government and eroding our individual rights. But to claim to care about ex-felon's voting rights when its really about the "outcome of the last 2 presidential elections" is disingenuous. To claim that a major political party is not working against individual rights when, in fact, that same party has routinely worked to erode the individual rights of law abiding citizens is ridiculous.
The Senate has passed a $700 billion financial bailout. Any idea where the government will get all of this money? It will come out of your pocket. Right after you cough up the money to pay off our ridiculous deficit.
